Multitronic vs PowerShift: which gearbox is more reliable?
According to our risk index, the Multitronic gearbox carries less risk than the PowerShift gearbox: 64/100 versus 72/100 (both high risk). The Multitronic gearbox has 2 documented serious faults, the main one being «Wear of the variator chain and cones»; the PowerShift gearbox has 3 documented serious faults, the main one being «Juddering, hesitation and slipping of the dry clutch (DPS6)».
The index (0–100) weights the severity and frequency of the three most serious documented faults. How it is calculated
Is the Multitronic gearbox reliable?
The multitronic is the continuously variable (CVT) automatic gearbox that Audi fitted, with front-wheel drive only, between 1999 and 2014: first the 01J code and, from 2007, the 0AW. It was fitted to the A4 from the B6, the A6 and the A5. Its reliability is limited - Gebrauchtwagenberater calls it Audi's "black sheep": the 01J concentrates control unit failures, jerking when pulling away and chain wear; the 0AW is notably more reliable, although it does not eliminate them entirely.[1][2][3]
See the 3 of the Multitronic gearbox faultsIs the PowerShift gearbox reliable?
Ford PowerShift covers two different dual-clutch gearboxes: the dry-clutch DPS6, fitted to the Fiesta, Focus, B-MAX, EcoSport and C-MAX; and the oil-bath 6DCT450, fitted to higher-torque diesels in the Focus, Kuga, Mondeo, S-MAX and Galaxy. The DPS6 has racked up thousands of complaints about juddering and slipping, with a US court settlement in 2020; the 6DCT450 is more robust, but needs its oil changed every 50,000-60,000 km to avoid wearing out the clutch.[4][5][6]
See the 4 of the PowerShift gearbox faultsSide-by-side comparison
| Item | Multitronic | PowerShift |
|---|---|---|
| Technical data | ||
| Type | Gearbox | Gearbox |
| Gearbox type | Continuously variable transmission (CVT) with a link chain running between cones, with an electronically controlled multi-plate start-off clutch instead of a torque converter | Dual-clutch, 6-speed: dry DPS6/6DCT250 (around 250 Nm) or oil-bath 6DCT450 (up to about 450 Nm), depending on version |
| Production | 1999–2014[1][2][3] | 2010–2023[4][5][7] |
| Reliability | ||
| Risk index (what is it?) | 64High risk | 72High risk |
| Documented faults | 3 | 4 |
| Of high or critical severity | 2 | 3 |
| Worst severity | Critical severity | High severity |
| Main faults |
| |
| Most expensive documented repair | No reliable data | up to €2,800Accelerated wear of the wet clutch in the 6DCT450Published figure[8] |
| Which versions to buy | ||
| BuyRecommended versions | None | None |
| With cautionVersions to be cautious about | ||
| AvoidVersions to avoid | None | None |
Severity of each fault: green, low; amber, medium; red, high; dark red, critical. How we rate them
Cars that each one is fitted to
Other comparisons
With the Multitronic gearbox
- Multitronic vs DSG7 DQ200
- Multitronic vs DSG6 DQ250
- Multitronic vs EAT6/EAT8
- Multitronic vs EDC
- Multitronic vs Dualogic
- Multitronic vs 7DCT
- Multitronic vs 7G-DCT
- Multitronic vs 7G-Tronic / 9G-Tronic
- Multitronic vs CVT Xtronic
- Multitronic vs AL4 / DP0
- Multitronic vs 09G (Aisin)
- Multitronic vs DSG7 DQ381/DQ500
- Multitronic vs ZF 6HP
- Multitronic vs ZF 8HP
With the PowerShift gearbox
- PowerShift vs DSG7 DQ200
- PowerShift vs DSG6 DQ250
- PowerShift vs EAT6/EAT8
- PowerShift vs EDC
- PowerShift vs Dualogic
- PowerShift vs 7DCT
- PowerShift vs 7G-DCT
- PowerShift vs 7G-Tronic / 9G-Tronic
- PowerShift vs CVT Xtronic
- PowerShift vs AL4 / DP0
- PowerShift vs 09G (Aisin)
- PowerShift vs DSG7 DQ381/DQ500
- PowerShift vs ZF 6HP
- PowerShift vs ZF 8HP
Compare other engines
Sources
Every fact on this page links to its source. If you find an error, let us know.
- MultitronicWikipedia · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026
- MultitronicWikipedia · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026 · in German
- Typische Probleme & Haltbarkeit der MultitronicGebrauchtwagenberater · Motoring press · consulted 27 September 2026 · in German
- Ford Focus (third generation)Wikipedia · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026
- Ford Fiesta (sixth generation)Wikipedia · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026
- Ford Mondeo MK5 (2014-2022): Typische Probleme & Rückrufegebrauchtwagenberater.de · Other source · published 9 August 2025 · consulted 27 September 2026 · in German
- GetragWikipedia · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026
- Ford Kuga (Mk2, 2012-2019): Typische Probleme & Rückrufegebrauchtwagenberater.de · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026 · in German
- Used Ford Fiesta (Mk7, 2017-2023) buyers guide: a solid second-hand superminiAuto Express · Motoring press · published 26 June 2026 · consulted 27 September 2026
- Ford S-Max: Typische Probleme & Rückrufegebrauchtwagenberater.de · Other source · consulted 27 September 2026 · in German